Conservative "Member" Of Parliament
For "Oceanside"-(it's not on the ocean),
James Lunney Is A Perfect Example
Of The Kind Of Diminished Humanity For "Oceanside"-(it's not on the ocean),
James Lunney Is A Perfect Example
We Have Orchestrating The Hell on Earth
That Is Canada In The 21st Century;
Countries Run By Asexual "Re-"Producers,
And Catamite Royalist Loyalists
Cannot Help But Be Heirarchies
With An Entity Of Reduced Humanity
Holding Sway Over Normal Humans
Humans Ruled By Humanimals
Diminished Of Humanity Embracing
The Touvier, Quisling, Campbell Bent
Of Serving Up Their Countrymen
For Rape And Murder
By An Animal Invaders
Humans Won't Invade And Conquer
The Cowardice Of The Dehumanized Creationist
Runs Rampant And Roughshod
Over Logical, Rational Humans Who,
On Account Of NOT Being Diminished
As Children By The Anti-Human,
Anti-Truth, Anti-Courage,
Anti-Power-Of-Peace,
Anti-Honor For The Planet,
Are Rendered Targets Of The De-Humanized
Embracer Of The Anti-Christ
The More Dehumanized We Become
The More People Will Percieve Us
As Walking Around, Going Through Life...
With Our Noses And Our Tails in The Air...
De-Humanization Accomodates Animality,
That Is Humans Are NOT Born Hierarchical,
Classist, Segregators With A Bent Towards
Substitute True History With Cowardly
Mother Gooseries So As To Never
Have To Deal With The Truth Again.
Mr. Speaker, recently we saw an attempt to ridicule the presumed beliefs of a member of this House and the belief of millions of Canadians in a creator. Certain individuals in the media and the scientific community have exposed their own arrogance and intolerance of beliefs contrary to their own. Any scientist who declares that the theory of evolution is a fact has already abandoned the foundations of science. For science establishes fact through the study of things observable and reproducible. Since origins can neither be reproduced nor observed, they remain the realm of hypothesis.
In science, it is perfectly acceptable to make assumptions when we do not have all the facts, but it is never acceptable to forget our assumptions. Given the modern evidence unavailable to Darwin, advanced models of plate techtonics, polonium radiohalos, polystratic fossils, I am prepared to believe that Darwin would be willing to re-examine his assumptions.
The evolutionists may disagree, but neither can produce Darwin as a witness to prove his point. The evolutionists may genuinely see his ancestor in a monkey, but many modern scientists interpret the same evidence in favour of creation and a creator
Whatever his reasons for bringing creationist theory into the Canadian Parliament, Nanaimo-Alberni MP James Lunney is keeping silent.He won’t say why he gave a speech in the House of Commons Charles saying Darwin would likely rethink his theory of evolution today, based on new knowledge creationists say disprove evolution. He failed to return numerous calls, and last week he rebuffed questions at a Nanaimo press conference…
“I won’t comment,” he said, pushing away a reporter’s recording device during a funding announcement at the Vancouver Island University library on Wednesday